|
Small 2001
|
University provided computers | Total | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 totally inadequate | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 perfect for my needs | 6 not applicable | ||||
| Institution | Harrison | Count |
9
|
37
|
70
|
128
|
116
|
17
|
377
|
| Row % |
2.4%
|
9.8%
|
18.6%
|
34.0%
|
30.8%
|
4.5%
|
100.0%
|
||
| Silverstone | Count |
15
|
40
|
140
|
279
|
224
|
8
|
706
|
|
| Row % |
2.1%
|
5.7%
|
19.8%
|
39.5%
|
31.7%
|
1.1%
|
100.0%
|
||
| Compton | Count |
14
|
37
|
127
|
270
|
179
|
104
|
731
|
|
| Row % |
1.9%
|
5.1%
|
17.4%
|
36.9%
|
24.5%
|
14.2%
|
100.0%
|
||
| Johnston | Count |
37
|
130
|
261
|
361
|
228
|
45
|
1062
|
|
| Row % |
3.5%
|
12.2%
|
24.6%
|
34.0%
|
21.5%
|
4.2%
|
100.0%
|
||
| Answer to question 19.2: How would you rate the adequacy of the following computer resources for your educational needs, 1 is totally inadequate and 5 is perfect for your needs (a) University provided computers [Survey/Codebook] | |||||||||
|
Small 2001
|
Your own computer equipment | Total | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 totally inadequate | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 perfect for my needs | 6 not applicable | ||||
| Institution | Harrison | Count |
24
|
25
|
44
|
63
|
131
|
78
|
365
|
| Row % |
6.6%
|
6.8%
|
12.1%
|
17.3%
|
35.9%
|
21.4%
|
100.0%
|
||
| Silverstone | Count |
38
|
60
|
85
|
110
|
96
|
269
|
658
|
|
| Row % |
5.8%
|
9.1%
|
12.9%
|
16.7%
|
14.6%
|
40.9%
|
100.0%
|
||
| Compton | Count |
28
|
45
|
81
|
189
|
303
|
78
|
724
|
|
| Row % |
3.9%
|
6.2%
|
11.2%
|
26.1%
|
41.9%
|
10.8%
|
100.0%
|
||
| Johnston | Count |
47
|
73
|
121
|
247
|
379
|
165
|
1032
|
|
| Row % |
4.6%
|
7.1%
|
11.7%
|
23.9%
|
36.7%
|
16.0%
|
100.0%
|
||
| Answer to question 19.2: How would you rate the adequacy of the following computer resources for your educational needs, 1 is totally inadequate and 5 is perfect for your needs (b) Your own computer equipment [Survey/Codebook] | |||||||||
|
Small 2001
|
Other equipment that you have access to | Total | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 totally inadequate | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 perfect for my needs | 6 not applicable | ||||
| Institution | Harrison | Count |
2
|
21
|
54
|
92
|
78
|
118
|
365
|
| Row % |
.5%
|
5.8%
|
14.8%
|
25.2%
|
21.4%
|
32.3%
|
100.0%
|
||
| Silverstone | Count |
18
|
43
|
104
|
118
|
74
|
302
|
659
|
|
| Row % |
2.7%
|
6.5%
|
15.8%
|
17.9%
|
11.2%
|
45.8%
|
100.0%
|
||
| Compton | Count |
12
|
15
|
113
|
207
|
132
|
234
|
713
|
|
| Row % |
1.7%
|
2.1%
|
15.8%
|
29.0%
|
18.5%
|
32.8%
|
100.0%
|
||
| Johnston | Count |
14
|
52
|
219
|
284
|
200
|
258
|
1027
|
|
| Row % |
1.4%
|
5.1%
|
21.3%
|
27.7%
|
19.5%
|
25.1%
|
100.0%
|
||
| Answer to question 19.2: How would you rate the adequacy of the following computer resources for your educational needs, 1 is totally inadequate and 5 is perfect for your needs (c) Other equipment that you have access to [Survey/Codebook] | |||||||||
| Home | HI-ED Technology | Student Technology | Small 2001 Student |
Copyright 2001 Brian L. Campbell
Page last modified:
June 29, 2001